Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Standardisation and Variation in English Language(s) / 2. Modernist Non-fictional Narratives: Rewriting Modernism Author and veteran Kurt Vonnegut faced this challenge of processing traumatic memories while trying to establish himself as a writer. A soldier in the US Army who served during the Ardennes Counteroffensive, Vonnegut was captured by the German forces and, as a prisoner, of war witnessed the Allied fire-bombing of Dresden in February 1945. His 1969 novel Slaughterhouse-Five, or The Children's Crusade: A Duty-Dance with Death was his attempt to make sense of a traumatic situation.
See Bénédicte Chorier-Fryd’s “The Pasture and the Freeway in Thomas Pynchon’s California,” in Poeti (...) Why are the last words of the novel Slaughterhouse-Five "Poo-tee-weet"? What statement is Vonnegut making by closing his text this way? Le discours rapporté et l’expression de la subjectivité / 2.Modernist Non-fictional Narratives of War and Peace (1914-1950)Gilcrest, David. “Cross-Cultural Roots of Ecopoetic Meditation.” Ed. J. Scott Bryson. Ecopoetry: A Critical Introduction. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2002: 17-28. Print. However as Billy and the others walk outside, silence falls again in the damaged streets of Dresden. The bird call of “poo-tee-weet?” underscores humanity’s—and Nature’s—inability to make a comprehensive statement about war, tragedy, and suffering. Although the novel’s existence in part counteracts the silence, human expression will always be incomplete and imperfect. adventurous readers, particularly lovers of literature who delight in their powers of association, aren’t immune to the risk of sentimental pastoral, either. In their enthusiasm they can neglect an elementary distinction: namely, that pastoral sounds, in a basic sense, do not exist. To speak of pastoral in literature is to enter a rich historical web of meaning that has been mediated over millennia by language. But sounds alone are not language. A phoneme is not a morpheme. Which is more pastoral: a diphthong or a plosive? Or, putting phonology aside, a hum or a chirp? Such questions don’t really make sense as they reflect a confusion of categories. This observation might sound like belabouring the obvious, but readers (including some very sophisticated readers) are sometimes tempted to blur the boundaries in the service of a desirable ideal, a longed-for linguistic Eden or uncorrupted sound palette. Consider this description by Terry Eagleton of the heyday of F.R. and Q.D. Leavis at Cambridge: It also interprets how human life is insignificant compared to nature itself. It is almost like nature is superior to what humans do.
Most of the time, individuals who fall victim to war will carry the experience and scenario in their whole lifetime. The story also tells that it can drastically change a person’s way of life for the worse. Merrill, Robert, and Scholl, Peter A. “Vonnegut’s “Slaughterhouse-Five”: The Requirements of Chaos.” Studies in American Fiction 6.1 (Spring 1978): 65-76. Rpt. In Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz and Cathy Falk. Vol. 60. Detroit: Gale Research, 1990. Literature Resources from Gale. Web. 13 February 2012.
Grands Entretiens : Archéologie d'un parcours
Reconstructing early-modern religious lives: the exemplary and the mundane / 2. Another Vision of Empire. Henry Rider Haggard’s Modernity and Legacy The merits of a metafictional approach to history stirred debate from the time of the book’s release. An early unattributed 1969 review in the New York Times viewed it in a positive light. See “Books of the Times: At Last, Kurt Vonnegut’s Famous Dresden Book,” The New York Times, March 31, 1969. In contrast, Joyce Carol Oates considered this manner of writing about history fundamentally flawed. See Oates, “Fiction Chronicle,” The Hudson Review, 22:3 (1969): 535-36. Gifford, in reference to Gary Snyder’s post-pastoral poetry, has pursued this line of post-pastoral questioning, asking “isn’t nature culture and culture nature?” (“Snyder and Post-Pastoral” 82). Quoting Snyder’s “By Frazier Creek Falls,” he underlines how the land “is all there is, forever / we are it / it sings through us—” ( No Nature, 234). Not only us, of course (this is Scigaj’s argument), but a schism between culture and nature is a false problem, and putting this problem behind us is fundamental to post-pastoral thinking. In a later essay, Snyder defends some of the supposedly alienating ingredients of culture: And then I explain to him how naïve we were, that the world did know and remained silent. And that is why I swore never to be silent whenever wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. Also, aside from the main character Billy, the other characters in the book have not had so much story to tell. They portray the effects of war and make them that way, lifeless. What is the Significance of the Closing Scene in Slaughterhouse-Five?
Billy first hears the "Poo-tee-weet" from a bird singing outside his window when he is in the ward for nonviolent mental patients in a VA hospital in New York. This bird makes a reappearance at the end of the novel; World War Two has just ended, people are flooding into the streets, and the "[b]irds were talking." Billy hears this phrase once again as the last line of the book. Que fait l'image ? De l'intericonicité aux États-Unis » / 2. « Character migration in Anglophone Literature » From the main character’s experience in the story, you can tell that he experienced a lot of misfortune in his life. He experienced war, the plane he rode crashed, went captive on another planet, and other things that made his life sound tragic. Gifford, Terry. “Five modes of ‘listening deeply’ to pastoral sounds.” Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism. 20:1 (2016): 8-19. Print. The very last line in Slaughterhouse-Five is: One bird said to Billy Pilgrim, ‘Poo-tee-weet? ‘. And from there, many readers knew the famous ‘Poo-Tee-Weet’ word first.
Présentation
recently, ecocriticism has sometimes evinced a suspicion not just of the sound of a certain kind of language but of language itself. In “Regarding Silence: Cross-Cultural Roots of Ecopoetic Meditation,” David Gilcrest asks, “What is writing but ‘dead ashes’ in comparison to life, the natural world?” (22). He writes approvingly of representing “experience of the world unmediated by language” (18), and of “silencing the chatter of language” (19). Our species’ linguistic capacity can be construed as a burden to be sloughed off. It becomes an obstacle or an annoying tic: dispensable “chatter.” In an ecocritical pastoral context, it would seem, language is of little use for the shepherd. To Snyder’s claim about seeing art in this context, we can readily add the possibility of hearing it. And how do we hear it? This invites the question of sound processes in a text, which I’ll illustrate with a selection of writers who preceded Kurt Vonnegut. What are some of the modes which go beyond sentimental pastoral? 2. Sound processes sounds in literature can be construed in a variety of ways, and there is always the risk of sentimental pastoral or escapism (Marx 5-11). An overly thematic approach reduces literature to a kind of costume party of rustic dress, baaing sheep and rippling brooks. Throw in a flute, and the pastoral soundscape is complete. Unfortunately, a thematic approach circumscribes the aural locus amoenus in the worst sense: it is conceptually parochial and easily slides into caricature. Cross-Dressing in Fact, Fiction and Fantasy / 2. Transnationalism and Modern American Women Writers
The closing scene in Slaughterhouse-five represents all the main character’s struggles in the whole story and the anti-war message of the story.
Articles “hors-thème”
The merits of a metafictional approach to history stirred debate from the time of the book’s releas (...)
Great Deal 
New Comment